After Two Heartbreaking Losses, Is Now the Time for Drastic Measures?
Jim Neveau, PIB Co-conspirator
Ever since the Olympic break, things seemed to have been going wrong for the Chicago Blackhawks.
Whether it’s blowing leads during games (notably second period meltdowns against Detroit and New York), or exhibiting poor effort on defense in others, the Hawks seem to be misfiring on a lot of cylinders as of late.
Their record of 3-3-1 since the break may not scream “horrible play” to casual observers, but the product that they have put onto the ice during these seven games hasn’t exactly been one that’s filling the fanbase with hope going into the stretch run.
As it stands now, the Hawks are down one of their primary offensive weapons (Brian Campbell), and are stuck with two goalies who don’t have a playoff win between them. With the heartbreaking losses piling up quicker than Joel Quenneville can comb his mustache, some creative thinking is going to be needed to bust the Hawks out of their doldrums.

Keith and Seabrook, with Jonathan Toews
Before we begin to get into the specifics of what the Blackhawks can do to extricate themselves from the terrible funk they are in, there is one fact that needs to be stated: this team is going to make the playoffs. In all likelihood, they will be one of the top three seeds in the Western Conference. Whether the team has Campbell or not, or whether or not they even begin to improve their sagging morale, this team is going to possess a high seed in the playoffs.
With this fact in mind, and knowing that the team is going to have to do some shuffling of blue liners to compensate for the loss of Soupy, here is the move that Joel Quenneville needs to consider immediately to shake up the team: break up the line of Duncan Keith and Brent Seabrook.
Keith and Seabrook have been playing together for the better part of three years now, and they have enjoyed a great deal of success. Both players are having career years offensively, both have been mentioned in NHL circles as one of the best pairings in the game, and both were selected to represent Team Canada in its gold medal winning effort at the Vancouver Olympics.
The sad fact of the matter as of late, however, is that Seabrook has not been carrying his weight. He has been sloppy on defense, mindless at times on offense, and in general seems to be in a slump of pretty sizable proportions.
One need look no further than to Saturday’s game against the Flyers to see what type of play Seabrook has been bringing to the table lately. It was his pass straight to the stick of Daniel Carcillo that set up Philadelphia’s first goal, and it was his ignorance of the presence of Chris Pronger on a 4-on-2 rush that allowed Pronger to score the game winning goal with two seconds in that contest.

Brent Seabrook (Pam Rodriguez)
Seabrook’s game record has been littered with these kind of errant passes and costly defensive errors, and it has weighed heavily on the Hawks’ fortunes. Since Seabrook had an assist and a +4 against the Boston Bruins in January, he has stumbled with three assists and a negative-4 over his previous 24 games. Seabrook has six games over that stretch where he has had a positive plus-minus: twice against Edmonton, twice against Columbus, one against Detroit, and one against Calgary.
Outside of the latter two teams, the other two teams aren’t exactly the cream of the crop. It isn’t a stretch to see that Seabrook has been a bit of a defensive liability for this squad, and his performance alone could potentially merit a demotion in the defensive ranks of this team.
A more abstract effect of Seabrook’s poor play has been the toll it has surely taken on Duncan Keith. Yes, Duncan is being mentioned as a favorite for the Norris Trophy this season, but with Campbell’s injury, a lot more of the offensive burden is going to rest on the shoulders of #2. With the added power play responsibility that is sure to come with Brian’s absence, Keith is going to need a solid defenseman to help in him regular strength situations, and Seabrook certainly hasn’t fit that bill as of late.
There are several arguments against making this move, however. The most obvious one is the chemistry angle. It is perfectly legitimate to worry about whether breaking up two guys who have almost exclusively been together the past few seasons will have a detrimental effect on either player, but there are some other angles to consider.
If Seabrook were to be demoted, Keith would likely still remain the catalyst for the top line and Seabs would find himself in the number two slot. This would undoubtedly ease a lot of the pressure that the hyper-competitive Seabrook puts onto himself, and could allow him to more easily rectify the issues that are plaguing his game.

Duncan Keith (Pam Rodriguez)
Even if the pressure of being on the top pairing isn’t what’s causing these failures, the mistakes Seabrook has been making could possibly be the result of nothing more than sheer complacency. After all, how many of us have felt like we’re just going through the motions at work, and our performance suffers because of it? Being demoted could potentially spur Seabrook to examine himself closer, and to fix the issues he is struggling with.
Another argument that holds some merit is that, due to his competitive nature, a demotion could hurt Seabrook’s confidence to a degree that he continues to play poorly. To counter this assertion, one need look no further than to the Olympics. Mike Babcock cut Seabrook’s minutes dramatically when he saw that Brent wasn’t getting the job done on defense, and it lit a fire under Seabrook’s rear end. He played out of his mind the final few games of the tournament, and was a tremendous asset to Canada’s chances.
One more issue that the separation could present would be the image it would portray to the rest of the league. “Are the Blackhawks really hitting the panic button while they sit in second in the West” is the question that would surely float throughout the minds of pundits and opposing teams alike if the Hawks were to make wholesale changes on the defensive side of the puck.
To quote Woody from the classic film “Toy Story”, “this is the perfect time to panic!”
It may not exactly be panicking per se, but if the Hawks were to break up their top pairing, there would be some significant upside to doing it sooner rather than later. With a good chunk of games left before postseason play begins in the middle of April, now is an opportune time to plant some changes and see if they take root. Tinkering with some time left before the playoffs would be a smart move by coach Quenneville, and if it all blows up in Q’s face, then he has time to put the pieces back together before the march to the Cup begins in earnest.
In addition, making this change now would benefit Chicago in another way too. The team is about to embark on a three game road trip, and if there’s a good time to make changes that have a possibility of failure, it’s when you aren’t face to face with 22,000 of your fiercest critics. For as passionate as Chicago sports fans are, they like to boo quite a bit. A team with sagging confidence surely does not need its own fans booing its efforts, and if the changes don’t work, Chicago can simply revert back to the original pairings before returning to town next Tuesday.

Could a Blue Line Shake-up Result in More of This?
Finally, the question has to be asked: what’s the worst way that this could possibly turn out? The experiment could explode in Joel’s face? The Hawks could lose a couple more games against teams that have a realistic shot at beating them anyway? People back home might get a little surly?
The benefits of a strategy like this far outweigh the potential pitfalls. Joel Quenneville has never hesitated when it comes to breaking up lines on his team. He even had the “audacity” to break up Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane for a while, just to see if it would help spark the team. He should approach the possibility of separating Keith and Seabrook from each other the exact same way.
With only 14 games remaining in the 2009-10 regular season, the Blackhawks are at an important crossroads. With many throughout the hockey world insisting that inaction isn’t a bad thing at this point, the Hawks would be well advised to give a hare-brained scheme like this a shot. With a playoff spot a certainty and a top three seed a near lock, the only thing the Blackhawks have to lose by at least giving this a few games trial period is a few more hockey games.
Even if that were to happen, and the team came back home with their losing streak stretched to five games (an unlikely scenario with the offensive talent the team is laden with), all that would need to happen would be to revert to the old alignment. This isn’t rocket science: the time to tinker is now, not in three weeks when the target of the postseason will be a lot closer than it is today.
Listen to reason Joel: give the bromance a break.
Tags: Brent Seabrook, Duncan Keith, Joel Quenneville, Jonathan Toews, Mike Babcock




















